Make me an angel that flies.

g03

This post is going out to honour some people who’re long dead. I’m talking about the Australians and New Zealanders (ANZACs), and their struggling ashore in the second year of World War I at a place called Gallipoli. The 25th will be the one hundredth anniversary of that event. It’s observed every year on ANZAC day, which would be the equivalent of Remembrance Sunday in Britain or Memorial Day in America. It holds a special meaning for those countries, and deservedly so.

I’m not from that particular neck of the woods nor hewn from that particular stock, and although it might be considered an impertinence for me to comment, I do know what a blood sacrifice by your fellow countrymen feels like, and I have kin there. A lot of young men were never going to come home. Some stuff, you never quite bounce back from with a fully grief-counselled grin plastered across your face. It’ll always be there, somewhere, a little blood-red badge of honour worn with bitter pride and yet one that’ll always stiffen your spine.

When you get a bit older, a bit more travelled through life, you realise in human terms what was actually chanced and what was really lost. They were the flowering buds of youth, every one a volunteer, the plucky best of their generation, and we’ll never get them back. Not a single one of them. They’re by now nothing more than faces in fading sepia photographs in their dress uniforms.

Yet when you look at the staged portraits they sent back to their loved ones, when you peer deeply at their faces, you see they’ve all got these same smooth features. It’s not a flattering trick of the photography, it’s just their features were still being formed – they were for the most part ridiculously young men, still children really. My sons would be considered old in that company, but I hope they’d have displayed such conspicuous gallantry in their younger years.

There simply isn’t a single reasonable explanation of the blood-letting of the Great War that holds up to any rational examination. It was just a number of empires in their death paroxysms doing nothing more than killing each other for an ever shrinking share of the colonial pie. Our forebears just had the misfortune to get sucked into the tragedy and paid a terrible price in blood.

All of that politics was irrelevant to the men on the beach working their way upward through the murderous hills and the men defending those hills against them, because as they all very quickly learnt, it was really about them fighting for each other and doing things like getting a wounded comrade out of harm’s way. Keep him safe from any more hurt and just get him home. All the rest of the queen, empire, country stuff was just a load of bollocks. You fought for your mates and they fought for you – the first, oldest and most vital lesson of soldiering. It was as simple as that. End of story.

Take a long and careful look at the picture heading up this article. It says it all. He’s getting a wounded mate down a steep mountain side but he’s still carrying his rifle with bayonet attached. That rifle says he’ll get him to safety, but he’ll turn around straight away and trudge back up the mountain to re-join his brothers in the fight. Cowards always throw away their weapons. They’re unconsciously withdrawing from the fight, showing themselves to be non-combatants – don’t kill me, I’m not carrying a weapon.

He’s still talking to his pal, keeping him good until he can get him to the docs and a bit of repair work and at the same time reminiscing with a smile. I have the impression he’s keeping him going by recalling some hijinks that neither of them could ever mention in polite company back home. The wounded man is so buggered he can’t walk but his left arm is crooked, making the effort to hold on to his friend, a totally unnecessary gesture when you’re in a fireman’s lift, but he’s doing his best to ease the worries for his friend. Some people are never out of the fight.

His pal has a stupid tilt to his hat everyone no doubt gave him serious grief for, but loved him anyway for being such a boyo. You can see it, they’re still bloody slagging each other off as they come down the mountain. That’s an exclusive brotherhood it’s impossible for anyone else to ever enter into. Let’s hope they both made it home.

It could have worked, it should have worked and so very nearly did – it was a damn close run thing, to quote Wellington. It wasn’t for lack of courage or effort, it was just the breaks. It was so unexpected an idea, it was brilliant and might have broken a barbed wire stalemate that already stretched by that stage from the English Channel right up to the Swiss border.

It didn’t succeed.

It failed for various reasons within the first twenty-four hours and thereafter descended into the worst sort of trench warfare to become the ANZAC agony. Some days are just hard and you have to take it, but they took it for months. It didn’t improve, but went on to become so bad it became a slow crucifixion nailed deeply into the national consciousness of both those two countries, never to be forgotten and is still remembered down through the generations to this day.

After nine months of clinging on desperately to an impossibly thin strip of nearly indefensible shoreline, the bloodied survivors were evacuated to safety. It was an impossible situation and by any idea of military competence, they should have been pulled out of there after the first month, if not week.

That delay was unforgivable.

Gallipoli was the first amphibious assault of the modern age and some of the military lessons to drawn from it were forgotten by the time Word War II arrived, resulting in equally disastrous operations like the Dieppe raid. Lessons had to be learnt afresh and the success of D-Day two years later owed a lot to the Dieppe disaster, and Gallipoli too.

I wasn’t at Gallipoli, neither were you, but perhaps if you saw your grandfather stiffen to attention when the last post bugle was being played on Armistice Day, you knew you’d missed out on something. As a young buck, you felt slightly ashamed of being excluded from a warrior thing that was theirs alone. What they’d been through could never be shared with the younger people and never was. It was the war to end all wars, and all the horrors they’d seen would perish with them and their pals.

There are not many positives to be taken away from the human tragedy that was Gallipoli, but I feel that the few there are can count as being significant.

The man who was in charge of defending what was thought of as a cushy posting that nobody in their right mind would attack, rose to the occasion. He’d actually anticipated the move though nobody believed him. Despite what you might have heard, there wasn’t many of them defending initially and they nearly broke under the initial onslaught. He personally stopped the rot, turned Johnny Turk around, made them dig in and fight.

He went on to shape the country we now call Turkey that rose out of the smoking ruins of what was the Ottoman empire. It would be a democracy, not a theocracy. It would be part of Europe, not the Arab world, and things like girls going to school and getting an education would become the norm. That tug-o-war between democracy and theocracy is currently tearing large parts of the Arab world asunder. His name was Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.

The man who came up with the plan to attack through the Dardanelles and pushed it, had no illusions about what the face of war looked like, because he’d seen it first hand. In the aftermath of what turned out to be a disaster and inexplicable as it may seem in these days of bland blameless middle-management politicians who can always slime themselves out from under any responsibility for anything, he resigned his post as First Lord of the Admiralty and re-joined his regiment on the western front.

He served in the trenches, not behind them, for six months before being nearly literally dragged out of them by people who thought with some prescience a man of his calibre would be too big a loss.

He went on to become the single and most unpopular voice in the political wilderness warning for nearly a decade what a threat Fascism was becoming. He was so out of favour with the establishment, that he averaged only one appearance per year on BBC radio in that time. When that threat finally materialised and the whole mess was dumped in his lap to sort out, the position as far as most sensible people were concerned was already hopeless. Negotiation with the enemy was the only rational policy.

For one blessed year, he held a country together that was reeling under the blows of successive defeat after defeat, with nothing more than a force of oratory that’s by now not only entered into the history books but made history. He spoke directly into the heart of the common man. They might only be the last remaining tiny gasp of democracy in Europe, but by God they’d fight in the air, on the seas, the beaches and all points inward. His name was Winston Spencer Churchill.

For Australia and New Zealand, I think Gallipoli had a slow but tectonic impact that changed those countries fundamentally. Before it, there was an unconscious assumption in the their national psyche that they were somehow nothing more than an appendage of the British empire, that they were at the end of day transplanted Britons somehow just visiting for a while. Australia, like New Zealand, was the name of a colony, an outpost of far-flung empire and not a country in its own right to be taken seriously.

Their experiences in the Great War, and most especially the agony of Gallipoli, changed that mind-set forever. Suspicion about the priorities of an empire whose interests were always going to supersede yours moved into mainstream thinking. Right or wrong, the perception grew that the lives of colonial troopers were held in less esteem than those of the homeland boys.

Those countries in a very real sense transitioned from thinking of themselves as being an offspring of empire to adulthood in their own right. A sense of nation, a national consciousness was born out of the blood sacrifice, and that’s a Jack you’ll never squeeze back into the box.

Without a doubt, Gallipoli was the birth of the countries we now call Australia and New Zealand.

A hundred years down the line, all the men of both sides who fought at Gallipoli are by now brothers under God or Allah or whoever looks after them. Take your rest lads, and your God take you to his heart, and keep you and love you.

©Pointman

Related articles by Pointman:

Heroes for a day.

The day of days.

Click for a list of other articles.

 

Comments
15 Responses to “Make me an angel that flies.”
  1. Timbotoo says:

    The photo could well be posed. That doesn’t take anything away from the article, though.

  2. Martin A says:

    When I was a kid I was mad keen on aeromodelling. Keil-Kraft, a maker of balsa kits, announced a new kit for a plane they named “The Anzac”. But within a week or two, they renamed it, after receiving numerous protests. Having read the above, I now understand why the protests were made.

  3. Blackswan says:

    Pointman,

    Thank you for acknowledging ANZAC Day – it’s surely an event imprinted on the psyche of a young nation, forged in the flames of foreign wars.

    Both my grandfathers were veterans of the ill-fated Gallipoli landings, one grievously wounded and eventually repatriated home, the other wounded, patched up and sent on to fight in the trenches of the Western Front and wounded again.

    While returned to their families, they continued to suffer from their injuries until coincidentally, they both died in a Sydney veterans’ hospital in 1924. By that time they each had little children born after their return, and I often wondered whether those men were friends who ever dreamed that fifteen years later their little kiddies would randomly meet, fall in love and marry, thus bringing them together in perpetuity.

    They were ‘brothers in arms’, patients in the same hospital, died in the same year and now joined forever in the genes of their descendants.

    While the Anzac casualties were huge considering the small populations of the ‘colonies’ on the other side of the world, the suffering of the British troops was monumental, especially the Lancashire and Dubliner Regiments. The loss of those men would ripple down the generations in subsequent bloody and futile conflicts.

    A truly horrendous period of history that will always be remembered in the Antipodes.

    In 1934 Atatürk wrote a tribute to the Anzacs killed at Gallipoli:

    Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives … You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours … You, the mothers who sent their sons from faraway countries, wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.

    This inscription appears on the Kemal Atatürk Memorial, Anzac Parade, Canberra.

    • Juliet 46 says:

      I thank Pointman for this essay and you for your very personal comment. I had never before seen Attaturk’s tribute to the ANZACs of Gallipoli, thank you for bringing it to my attention.

      The “War to End All Wars”….I am in tears.

      • Blackswan says:

        Thank you Juliet. In the aftermath of WW1 every Australian city, town and village built a memorial to their lost sons; sometimes a simple obelisk, sometimes the finely crafted statue of a soldier with head bowed in remembrance, but always with a ‘Roll of Honour’ naming and remembering the lost men and boys of their communities.

        It has always grieved me that nowhere on those horribly long lists of soldiers, do the names of my grandfathers appear, nor of any of the wounded and maimed who returned to carry the burdens of their afflictions, and struggled to resume their lives but still died young as a direct result of injuries inflicted on the battlefield.

        What have we learned in a hundred years when the veterans of modern conflict suffer the same fate on the home-front? The only Honour Roll for those wounded warriors is in the hearts of those who love them.

        All the rest of us can do is to offer them respect and thank them for their service.

        Lest we forget … any of them.

    • nofixedaddress says:

      Lest we forget

  4. IanA says:

    Thank you from here in Australia.

  5. gripegut says:

    This is a great article, as usual, but you missed the mark on Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Ataturk was partially responsible for the Christian/Armenian Genocide in what is now Turkey, a country that seems Westernized but is much more like the Arab world than the Western one. Ataturk was partially responsible for the torture, rape, and mass killings of nearly 2,000,000 Christians in Turkey. The world should have no words of praise for this despicable murderous villain.

    http://www.armenian-genocide.org/kemal.html

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/04/23/the-crucial-reason-glenn-beck-says-the-world-must-recognize-the-armenian-genocide/

  6. Pointman says:

    People have raised some interesting points about Gallipoli and the Great War in general. As Blackswan noted, non-ANZAC casualties were horrendous; 3-4 times the dead and 6 times the wounded. I wished to keep the focus on the ANZAC contribution, since that’s the day they adopted, but you have to honour all the people who served there.

    It was a peculiarity of the war that while New Zealand eventually brought in conscription to replace losses, the Australian parliament refused to do so. This had the unfortunate effect of wounded Australian troopers too often being patched up and sent back into the line when arguably they should have been sent home.

    Something else Blackswan said touches on an area which is a sore point for all veterans – who was actually killed in a war. All too often, ex-soldiers die of wounds both physical and mental a few years after the conflict, and yet their names will never appear on memorials. I think the American idea of having a Veteran’s Day and a Memorial Day moves some way to address the problem. The former is to honour all who have served and the latter for those killed in action.

    Pointman

    • Old Rooster says:

      I think that idea for separate commemorations as in the U.S. has a great deal of merit though I can’t see that there is an obvious candidate other than 11 November and there is little appetite by business or conservative governments here in providing another public holiday. Several of my family served in WWI mostly as light horsemen in the eastern Mediterranean theatres. One great uncle served on the Western Front and was injured severely several times. After return to Australia he spent the rest of his life in some kind of care facility, initially as a patient but then as a gardener because he wouldn’t leave and rejoin the world. Truly not all casualties are on the battlefield.

  7. Onyabike says:

    Like many small nations, we Kiwis often struggle with issues of our self-identity. Unfortunately, it is usually the burden of the brave and the young to make the sacrifices that later define us. Thank you Pointman for taking the time to put our centennial memorial day into prose.

    Because of my occupation I have been privileged to march among veterans at each dawn parade. The good people of our community always give us a great applause when we fall out. I cant properly express how valuable their support is to me and my colleagues. However, I feel a bit of an interloper when I measure myself against the gnarled old vets’ who lead off the parade…

    Your words about family, sacrifice and brotherhood were well said Blackswan.

    They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
    Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
    At the going down of the sun and in the morning,
    We will remember them.

  8. durango12 says:

    It is fine to pay homage to those who fell, the fellows who came from down under because no northerners could be spared from the fruitless trench warfare in France. But the cold light of history will place blame on Sir Winston and the craven leaders who brought Britain into a war she did not need or was even honor-bound to enter. Yes, without her there would likely have been a German presence across the Channel and Germany would have dominated the Continent — which is what we have today. But with her there was a generation gone, and a forever financially crippled country taken in by socialism. Without her, there would have been no Versailles, no second round, perhaps no 70 years of Bolshevism, .. the whole bad century that we still deal with today.

  9. JohnTyler says:

    About how many individuals made the decision to take Europe to war in 1914?
    Let’s estimate:
    In Germany we have the Kaiser, some of his aides and some Prussian generals; let’s say a total of 20
    England: the Prime Minister, his cabinet, some top generals: say 20 individuals
    France, Russia, Austria, Turkey; let’s say 20 individuals at each government; that’s 80 individuals.
    Lastly, let’s not forget Woodrow Wilson of the USA; a supremely arrogant, clueless man who ran for president promising to keep the USA out of the war , but did the opposite. Let’s say it was he and about 5 of his aides that pushed the USA to go to war.

    So, the grand total is roughly 100 to 150 individuals.
    I think it’s safe to say that of this group, NONE OF THEM fought on the front lines.

    The very scary situation is how a very, very few individuals can arouse the emotions of millions to such a level that many (most?) willingly go off to a war to fulfill the dreams of a bunch of arrogant, elitist, “intellectual” child-men.

    I will speculate that WWII was also brought about by the wishes of about 150 “leaders” and diplomats; you know, the ruling class, the “intellectuals” who are just smarter and more knowledgeable than the average working stiff.

    Yea right.

    • Old Rooster says:

      A very little research on one of the significant decision makers might have revealed this—

      “For several months Churchill served in the sinecure of Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. However on 15 November 1915 he resigned from the government, feeling his energies were not being used. Although remaining a member of parliament, on 5 January 1916 he was given the temporary British Army rank of lieutenant colonel and served for several months on the Western Front, commanding the 6th Battalion of the Royal Scots Fusiliers. While in command at Ploegsteert he personally made 36 forays into no man’s land. In March 1916, Churchill returned to England after he had become restless in France and wished to speak again in the House of Commons.” [his being denied a command and appointment as Brigadier–General might have also been a factor.]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: