I may have signed my actual death warrant.

burn01

Those words were spoken by a man called Michael Collins when he signed what was in effect a peace agreement between Ireland and Britain to end the bloodletting of the War of Independence, knowing his country would be deeply divided on the question of the amount of independence the treaty would grant. He signed anyway because he was realistic about what was politically achievable but also for another reason.

It was never about him but his love of something bigger – his country. It’s often conveniently forgotten nowadays by both sides just how savage that war was. Make no mistake, a lot of things on the road to places like Lidice and Oradure-sur-Glane happened out in the sticks and not even the big cities were untouchable. The country and the people had suffered enough, even in his home county of Cork and something workable that would bring peace was finally on offer.

Sadly, his intuition about his own fate came to pass; he was targeted and killed not long afterwards in an ambush by his own former comrades who were opponents of the treaty. He became a non-person in the land he loved and had given his life for, and one of whom very few kind official words were spoken for many decades.

This piece is not about the perhaps still sensitive scabs of old history, Irish or otherwise, but about future history and courageous people like Collins prepared to make brave decisions which they know will result in personal difficulties, both for them and their families. They do so because there’s something larger at stake than just their careers, reputations, livelihoods and even at times their lives. They choose the honourable course forward and being too realistic to suffer from martyrdom complexes, have hopes of moving the current situation forward towards something better and perhaps even surviving themselves.

At this particular moment, the scientist Dr. Willie Soon is being targeted in a concerted vilification campaign by various propagandists safely ensconced in the supposedly respectable organs of the legacy media like the New York Times, the Washington post, the Boston Globe,  the Guardian and what can only be described nowadays as science rags such as Nature and Scientific American. I’m impressed the BBC resisted the temptation to pile in but watch this space – they’re probably too busy outing their own stars of yesteryear who sexually molested children they made available and then looked the other way.

The whole thing at any level is distasteful, to say the least. Even some bottom-feeding pond life in Congress have now got in on the act and you can’t help but get the feeling it’s only a matter of time until a Committee on Unclimatical Activities will be convened. It’s back to the past rather than the future, and that past is 1950’s America in the witch-hunting grip of trial by media McCarthyism. It is after all still the land of the free and the home of the brave, except nowadays that means the brave refusing to wilt under the pressure of elected thugs making free with any rights they might have under the constitution to freedom of expression. Tell me, does that star-spangled banner yet wave?

It’s by now the usual routine. If they can freeze him out of publishing in the journals, get him sacked or at least pressure his academic employers into revoking his tenure, they’ll be sending a message to any other researcher – be very positive about the almost papal infallibility of climate science or we’ll gang up and target you too, and it’s very much a part of the message that they don’t give a shit about how obvious or plain vicious it looks.

When you want to make an example of someone, you have to make sure everyone can see it. We can destroy anyone who opposes us and nobody will come to their defence, because nobody is going to fly into that danger zone. Dr. Soon is a walnut they’re determined to very publicly crack. The usual response to such overwhelming pressure is people shut up, consign any doubts they might have to the other people’s problem category and keep their head down. To his credit, he hasn’t.

As one would expect, the skeptic blogosphere has rallied to his defence, since we know only too well how it feels to be on the business end of a two-minute hate. It’s a peculiarity of the climate wars that the alarmists are too afraid to debate anything but instead choose to concentrate their attacks their opponent’s character.

I find it absolutely deplorable but at the same time revealing, that none of the people who’ve been busy repositioning themselves in recent years as honest brokers in the middle of the climate wars have come to his aid, even if it’s only to be skulking behind some fig leaf like being in defence of a nobler abstraction such as academic freedom, but I suppose that’d require some intestinal fortitude. To restate that more explicitly, some guts or to put it even more bluntly, some bollocks. Anyway, their thinking runs along the lines of a rather guarded better him than me, so let him take the thrashing.

Some true colours are being nailed to masts by circumstances, rather than by any volition on their part.

They’ve obviously decided to keep their mouths shut and hope nobody notices, and they’ll slither back out of the woodwork in a week or two when it’s all blown over and clamber once again atop their massive anthill of superiority to become yet again the voices of sweet reason preaching to all and sundry. It’s only when push comes to shove you’ll find out exactly who’s all mouth and trousers, and on this outing they’ve yet again shown themselves up to be exactly what they are.

It’s so difficult to always appear good and virtuous to everyone when you’re being forced to make some hard ethical choices – it’s better to do nothing. Looking on the bright side, I suppose we can chalk up their defrocking to the climate thugs. And the creeps get all offended that we won’t grovel and suck on their twinkly toes in gratitude for them sorta deigning to engage with poor denier scum like us …

Even if I didn’t have massive reservations about the science underpinning the theory of global warming, I’d choose not to be on the side of proponents of any argument that not only resorts to such gutter tactics, but more importantly one whose leading figures condone such execrable behaviour by their silence.

Irrespective of my own position, I’d support Dr. Soon, if only on principle, and yet at the same time I’d still feel comfortable laying into his interpretation of the scientific facts if I disagreed with it. That’s the way discourse in grownup science works but of course that’s terra incognita when discussing the climate, because that’s all about politics rather than science.

He’s not the first, won’t be the last and there were certainly a lot of good people before him who followed the data where it led, rather than bent it to an interpretation that was politically correct. If you’ve been following the climate wars for as long as I have, I’m sure you can pick out a lot of personal heroes who’ve taken a bullet for integrity but we should never forget those other casualties of war, the nameless ones who never made it to a mention in the skeptic blogosphere and some sort of recognition. They might not have been science rock stars, but they took their own stand in obscurity and their own bullets too.

It’s sobering to note that the leader of the opposition to the peace treaty signed by Collins, and the man who adroitly left the hot-potato political decision to him in order to keep his own skirts clean, went on to become prime minister and then president of Ireland for many years, which were in many people’s opinion its Brezhnev years of decay. He was asked in the late autumn of his life what he thought of Collins from the perspective of forty years since his death. Nobody had dared to broach that still sensitive subject with him in years.

He thought about it for some time and spoke the following words which should be taken as one of those rare moments of complete candour by a politician, perhaps because it no longer mattered and he felt a need for expiation – and he refused to ever be drawn on the subject again. “It is my considered opinion that in the fullness of time, history will record the greatness of Michael Collins and it will be recorded at my expense.”

History, as by then I think he realised it would, has done exactly that. Some men will not die. They haunt you down the years.

In the same way, I feel posterity will be kind to those individuals of lonely courage who took a principled stand for the integrity of science against political ideology and suffered the consequent damage, and it will be at the expense of populist demagogues who did nothing more than bay like a pack of feral dogs for such blasphemers to be burned at the stake. Let’s be clear on this, their stand is nearly always for the science, not about picking a side or laying it all on the line to be a skeptic.

Unlike the alarmists, our heroes are not insubstantial paper men, origami figures fashioned by nothing more than lies and propaganda. Our ones have been tested in a red-hot furnace of hate, scorn and very personal betrayal, and survived it on nothing more than their own individual brand of courage. We can count ourselves lucky to have people of such calibre positioned anywhere over that line called climate scepticism.

©Pointman

Related articles by Pointman:

The decline of popular science journals.

The BBC : Aunty Beeb or Mummy knows best?

The Age of Unenlightenment.

A wedding.

Click for a list of other articles.

 

Comments
14 Responses to “I may have signed my actual death warrant.”
  1. Reblogged this on gottadobetterthanthis and commented:

  2. Hazze says:

    Last for lines will become classic….yeee I hope Soon reads it…

  3. Blackswan says:

    Pointman,

    In this arresting dissertation on principles and integrity, thank you for remembering that “we should never forget those other casualties of war, the nameless ones …”.

    Since the entire western education system has been hijacked by the Marxist Climate Propagandists, our children have become ‘the nameless casualties of the Climate Wars’. It’s in our schools where young people learn how the System works for them and how they can ‘work the System’. That’s why the Dr Soons of our world are beacons of light and enlightenment, and should be protected.

    Students are asked to write about the many ways that “carbon pollution is changing the climate and destroying the planet”. If they choose to swim upstream, do some elementary research and produce a well-written essay refuting a teacher’s premise that Co2 is a “pollutant”, they’ll be given a C-minus or an F for failing to complete the assignment. This is how the smart ones ‘disengage’ from the System. While they may graduate with high scores if they tell ’em what they want to hear to protect their own interests, it’s not necessarily with any real belief in what they are being taught, or respect for the people teaching them. But it’s certainly a “how-to-get-ahead” lesson they carry into their professional lives.

    Others can enter university as independent thinkers with an insatiable curiosity about their world who emerge years later as rabid Greenie footsoldiers, regarding Climate Realists as ‘old fashioned’ ignorant adherents to ‘old science’. Haven’t you heard? This is the brave new world of post-modern science – after all, everybody says so. “Get with the program”, and another one bites the dust.

    This is undoubtedly another War of Independence – independent minds with any capacity for critical thought are now an endangered species. Fight on.

    • spetzer86 says:

      It is in the schools where the indoctrination starts. This is especially true in the UK, Australia, and the USA. It doesn’t stop at climate change, either. Here’s a good site for more information regarding modern educational goals and where the programs came from: http://Www.invisibleserfscollar.com

      • Blackswan says:

        Thanks spetzer86 – interesting site with interesting ideas, namely …

        A confessed goal of steering society and “using public leverage to shape private decisions to achieve collective goals” is using sovereign power for personal manipulation and control over individuals. Pure and simple.

        Alarm bells starting clanging for me in the early 1990’s when I had a discussion with a schoolteacher who tried to convince me about their new policy for ‘Competency’. If a child ending primary school could not read, and the only book they were interested in was a Mickey Mouse comic book, then they would be given ‘credit’ and a passing grade for that, the rationale being that if the child was ‘competent’ in their own choice of reading material then the text and subject matter were irrelevant. Pictures can tell a story too, dontcha know?

        Besides, didn’t I realise I was being “elitist” for making distinctions between Mickey Mouse and Robert Louis Stevenson? I was being highly discriminatory to cast aspersions at Mickey Mouse if that was the best a child could do.

        That’s when I realised we had entered the ‘twilight zone’ of rational debate.

  4. Rick Bradford says:

    Although many may feel that the climate debate is just a skirmish in the wider culture wars, i.e. the struggle between Rationalism and Emotionalism, I think that it is turning into a pivotal battle, a Stalingrad.

    Because the narcissistic Left has poured so many resources at winning the climate debate and have achieved, in political terms, almost nothing, when their momentum on this issue finally stalls, a whole range of other sacred cows will tumble with it — educating people to be as stupid as possible, inviting into our countries millions of people who disrespect and exploit our traditions, curbing free speech, and so on.

    They know this as well, which is why they are mounting increasingly desperate assaults.

    • beththeserf says:

      No reply tag fwr Blackswan,

      So herewith. Re R. L. Stevenson and Mickey er, Mouse. We all have the
      right to an opinion but one opinion ain’t necessarily as good as another,
      in literature, rich exploration of human condition, poetry ‘n such, in science,
      logic, evidence, tests ‘n such. Mustn’ make distinctions re MM and RLS is
      kinda’ like, in post -modern science, the argument that two competing
      theories are incommensurable. As if they’re not both responses to some
      real world problem situation and hence able ter be compared re dealing
      with anomalies, like Ptolemy/ Copernicus et al ( Not Al.) Say serfs don’t
      know much, but go Karl Popper!

      bts

      PS R.L. Stevenson wrote a fascinating book called ‘Prince Otto.’ And
      of course ‘Kidnapped.’ Think I’ll read it again. )

  5. Geoff Sherrington says:

    Pointman,
    Like you, I am disgusted by the Soon events.
    However, I have a fear that I cannot yet quantify.
    The fear is that one day, you and I will face a fete accompli.
    The sufferagettes, for example, created new social attitudes and won.
    There comes a point when a paradigm shift that is disagreeable to you and me, succeeds.
    Have you developed private criteria that might identify if such a shift is happening with global watming and what can be effective to combat it from here on in?
    In recent days I have met so cially with a number of delightful young mothers who migrated from China to Australia in the last 5 years.
    These ladies are 100% sure that carbon pollution has to be stopped at all costs, but it is clear that they have been educated since childhood to equate particulate pollution with CO2. They prosetylise about pollution as if it an imperative to avoid deah, using trms like PM2.5 as if they understood them and that they were evil.
    Are we reaching an irreversible position from the onslaught of mass propaganda?
    When, if ever, do we have to prepare that democracy, the will of the majority, has happened?

    • Blackswan says:

      Geoff – it isn’t only young Chinese women who have been indoctrinated into absolute certainty that the planet is doomed; try having a rational conversation with any bright-eyed Aussie university graduate about climate change and you’ll find that the very people who should have a basic understanding of science and computer modelling are just as ignorant and deluded.

      You may well ask; “Are we reaching an irreversible position from the onslaught of mass propaganda?”

      This radio interview with our Prof Bob Carter certainly demonstrates cause for your concerns…….

      http://www.2gb.com/audioplayer/93951

      Carter is Australia’s Prof Willie Soon, another scientist of truth who has been pilloried and ostracised by the Establishment.

      This conversation with broadcaster Alan Jones shows that ordinary Australians are losing billions in the value of their property assets because of CAGW propaganda, and changes of government make no difference whatsoever.

      The Juggernaut trundles on.

  6. Shoshin says:

    Finally read “The Fountainhead”. Excellent book. Not sure why it took me so long to get to it. Quite timely and pertinent to today actually, considering that it was written in 1943. The sad part is how the socialists seek to live off of and re-direct the value created by others, even though they are unable to create value themselves.

    Much to close to home for my liking. Also the propaganda campaigns in the book are so similar to that in today’s “Climate Wars” that it is more than a bit unsettling.

    Ayn Rand had it right, even 70+ years ago, fascism and socialism are the same in that they both take from society and contribute nothing.

  7. Santa's Little Helper says:

    You might not like him or his policies but an even better example is the leader of the UK party UKIP. The venom spat at him in the MSM is extremely revealing.

  8. Pointman says:

    If you like quality and eclectic blogging for the over 12s, an old favourite has just came back online – Orkney Lad’s blog. Enjoy and add it to your faves.

    http://www.glebedigital.co.uk/blog/

    Pointman

    • Blackswan says:

      Thanks for the tip P – so good to see the Glebe Digital Library open for business again.

      Great place to learn amazing ‘stuff’. Welcome back OL

  9. beththeserf says:

    Oh Socrates! Oh them individuals of lonely courage! Oh huzzah fer another essay
    fer the open society, thx Pointman.
    beth the serf.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: