The ultimate hack.

BioHack04

An article this week in India’s Economic Times newspaper reported on a formal complaint lodged with the Delhi police of sexual harassment from an employee of The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) against one of its directors, a certain RK Pachauri, who also happens to be the chairman of the IPCC. Obviously there’s no conflict of interests in holding down both posts. The 75-year-old is accused by a 29-year-old woman of inappropriate and unwelcome advances, even after she’d repeatedly indicated any infatuation was not returned.

The article has been taken down from the paper’s website because of what looks to be an injunction, commonly called a gagging order, by the Indian courts but you can still find screen print copies of the article in these two pictures here and here (H/T Ric Werme). Given that the respected daily also has a reasonable paper circulation in which the story has already appeared on the front page, I’m not sure how a retrospective gagging order can be applied to the story. Perhaps it obliges people to hand back that day’s paper.

Among other things, the 33 page formal complaint alleges a bombardment of inappropriate communications using different social networking platforms, such as SMS and WhatsApp messages, as well as his email account and even his mobile phone. The truth or not of the allegations will no doubt be thoroughly investigated by the police, though it has to be said it would take a brave and deeply aggrieved woman to go up against such a rich and powerful figure, especially in a country like India, which is considered by many to have a systemic rape culture largely indifferent to a woman’s right to say no, never mind something thought less grievous such as sexual harassment.

In a statement to the paper, Mr. Pachauri said that these risqué messages didn’t originate from him because all the various accounts and devices the messages were sent from had been mysteriously hacked by a party or parties unknown. At face value, that seems a reasonable explanation but it does seem a lot of trouble to hack all these different accounts. Some time back, I outlined how much work an external hack takes in reality rather than in the movies, and after the disastrous fallout from the climategate “hack” (wink wink nod nod), I’m sure the head of the IPCC would certainly be more security conscious than most.

Apparently this harassment has been going on since September 2013, which is when the lady joined the company, so I do find it curious that such an extensive breaching of all his accounts has gone undetected for nearly a year and a half.

I have to say though, that if I had access to his email account and wished him ill, I could think of a lot more interesting ways of making his life extremely difficult, rather than harassing a relatively junior employee of his company. Perhaps something like the anonymous publication of all his emails – Pachaurigate? I think I should TM that name right now, if only in the unlikely event that such a thing should occur.

At least he’s not accusing the poor woman of making a malicious complaint to the police about him which, if there should be a complete miscarriage of justice and he’s found guilty of the accusations, would leave him open to a defamation countersuit. I’m sure he must be very confident that after an exhaustive investigation, enough traces will be found of the mysterious hacker by a co-opted section of Norwich Constabulary to completely exonerate him à la climategate.

Of a more technical consideration, I have to say that there’s only so much hacking can do. For instance, it can’t hand-write notes which are apparently part of the documentation attached to the woman’s complaint. I suppose we could be dealing with a multi-skilled hacker who’s also expert at forging a person’s writing. I think hacking someone’s handwriting is a very reasonable explanation of what was obviously a part of a nefarious plot.

The ultimate and most sophisticated step of the hack can be deduced from a quote in the newspaper from the formal complaint – “On many occasions, against my wishes and despite knowing that I am totally against any such behaviour/act, Dr Pachauri has grabbed my body by hugging me, holding my hands, forcibly kissing me and touching my body inappropriately.”

Since Dr Pachauri has not accused the lady in question of making false accusations and indeed put all those regrettable incidents down to hacking, then the only reasonable explanation is obvious – someone hacked his hands on several occasions. This is a whole new area of what can only be called grope-hacking, which I must confess I’ve never heard of.

When you put it all together; the hacking of multiple accounts, his mobile phone, his handwriting and even his hands, it becomes obvious that Mr. Pachauri is the target of a massive and very sophisticated conspiracy, which is no doubt being financed by the usual suspects of Big Oil, Koch brothers and the bulging coffers of the skeptic blogosphere. If I didn’t know better, it could almost be mistaken for “conspiracy ideation” or a rather flimsy excuse for some rather dirty old man behaviour.

His explanation is strongly supported by a flood of commenters, whom nobody has seen before, onto the skeptic blogs which are covering the story. Strangely enough, their advice seems to be suspiciously uniform – for various reasons of both shame and virtue, we shouldn’t mention Pachauri’s travails. Just move along now. Some cynical types might just think these newbies are nothing more than a few paid trolls operating under several sock puppet personas brought in to minimise the damage and get the story suppressed.

There’s no chance of this ballooning into another Strauss-Kahn affair, with more women being emboldened to come forward and make complaints against him, since Pachauri’s reputation with regard to how he treats ladies of the opposite sex is quite legendary in climate circles. It really is.

Getting back to the realms of reality, there’s absolutely nothing funny about sexual harassment for its victims. It’s a deeply distressing experience and should be recognised and condemned for what it is – predatory sexual behaviour which should be prosecuted with the same rigour as any other crime against the person.

©Pointman

Related articles by Pointman:

An outline of a hack.

Why would anyone believe a single word coming out of their mouth?

Armageddon Report No. 5.

Click for a list of other articles.

 

Comments
22 Responses to “The ultimate hack.”
  1. Petrossa says:

    The sad truth is you apply the framework of a modern advanced democratic justice based system to a corruptible vague semblance of a democracy, class based society. Obviously in their world the word of a mere woman doesn’t account for much against an influential high class male. As much as India pretends to be civilized, it’s still a long way from even ‘democracies’ such as Russia.

    This will go somewhere… in the vast nothingness of manipulations

    • Old Rooster says:

      Yikes for a second there I thought you were fingering Australia. We’re not as bad as India…yet!

      • Petrossa says:

        naaah. Australia is a “modern advanced democratic justice based system”. India’s caste society really is something from way back when. It needs reconsidering the definition of ‘civilization’ to include it as such. Civilization still seems to much like ‘civilized’ which India and many other nations certainly aren’t.

  2. agfosterjr says:

    First I’d heard of the business, and well presented. –AGF

  3. Old Rooster says:

    Perhaps the poor chap has been possessed by one or more hacker demons👹👺❗️

    The likes of Holocaust deniers such as David Irving have been shunned by many nations and denied entry visas to tour and lecture on their positions. Perhaps a similar response should occur to unfit and improper persons who stride the world stage spruiking their nonsense, at vast imposition on the public purse, and who clearly behave in a manner at least less than moral and often criminal. If such a policy were to be adopted by the civilised nations I might suggest divestment in shares in those industries involved in the luxury travel industry.

    Freedom of thought and speech should not imply enabling of the same by taxing those who find these people repugnant in thought and actions.

  4. Blackswan says:

    Pointman,

    A great overview of a most shocking multi-faceted incident of hacking, the perpetrator of which has set world records in variety and form.

    I suspect I know who it is.

    It’s the same person who broke undetectably into the home of an Australian Labor Member of Parliament, stole his mobile phone, his company credit cards, his car keys, driver’s license and his car, drove two hours into Sydney to a brothel, spent several hours there in the ‘Turbo Room’ with a sex worker, then drove back to the MP’s house and again broke in, replacing the phone, the keys, and everything else back in the bloke’s wallet, all undetected by the man or his wife. Not only did he use the credit card to pay for such services by forging the MP’s signature, he had plastic surgery to match his appearance to the MP’s photo ID.

    AND he did it multiple times, racking up a bill of over $6,000. Now THAT is a dedicated crook!

    And we know it’s true because that MP stood in our Parliament and, amid tears and with trembling chin, wailed for a full hour that the randy burglar/brothel creeper was NOT him; that he’d been ‘set up’ by opposing factions within his own Labor Party.

    Although it must be said, Pachauri’s hacker is a master of the craft, even forging those groping hands and Patchy Poo’s bad breath in the young woman’s face.

    Meanwhile she will find her career as a research analyst will suddenly stall, she’ll be promoted sideways (if at all), it will be noted on her personnel file that she isn’t really a ‘team player’ and her colleagues will regard her with suspicion lest she reports their words and misdeeds too.

    What is it with money and power and flaccid old men? Maybe Joe Biden could offer some advice on groping – just do it – and to hell with the consequences.

    http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2015/02/19/letterman-skewers-our-groping-vice-president-top-10-things-joe-biden-said-at-this-moment/

    • Old Rooster says:

      Quite likely. That petty crim and master of personation is still at large and looking for gainful employment, as long as it’s not an honest day’s work. He’s not that tech savvy so I suspect he has subcontracted the MI Team to cover those aspects.

  5. Power Grab says:

    IIRC, don’t they say he wrote a porn novel? Maybe he’s collecting material for a sequel?

    • Brian H says:

      Actually, I immediately assumed he’d lost track of the distinction between his porn fantasies and life. His fantasy life never faces rejection, and he could never grok that real babes find him buffoonish.

  6. Hazze says:

    The mans been mailing me bout my butt for years🙂

  7. While scanning comments at WUWT
    —————————————
    Leo Smith February 23, 2015 at 1:59 am

    ” In one of Castenada’s novels there is a story about a young man who left his poor village in Mexico and went to the city to get an education.
    On his return to the village years later he found that the villagers were in thrall to a man who had a book, out of which he read long passages. This book it appeared contained all they needed to solve their problems. However the young man noticed that the man was holding the book upside down.
    “Your hero is a fraud: He cannot read” he declared “And I can prove it, he is holding the book upside down!”
    “What difference does it make, to a man who can read, which way up the book is? ” retorted the man, and the villagers cheered…
    The problem is, that when people reject all of science already, a scientific refutation of global warming is (politically) meaningless.
    I too have been appalled by the standards of debate over this, and other, issues. I have come to a terrifying conclusion.
    Perhaps less than 10% of the population understands science at all, and of that 10% probably less than 10% actually understand the mathematical principles involved in the AGW proposition. And most of those are not in climate science.
    This is ultimately both something that has always been the case with science and indeed rational thought, and something that is deeply worrying right now, because we are in a deep crisis as a society and need better understanding than that.
    Humanity en masse proceeds along more or less bigoted lines according to the fashionable prejudices of the age. The AGW protagonists understand this: their business is to move the fashionable bigotry along to suit their agenda.
    If we step back a minute and regard the implications of what I propose to be the case, they are these: The vast majority of humanity is incapable for one reason or another of understanding the science and technology that forms the backdrop to their lives. And in a democracy that means they are more or less unfit to vote on matters that affect it.
    A small minority of ‘movers and shakers’ – and these days they are (to borrow Jilly Coopers terminology) the ‘Tellystocracy’ , the media luvvies and those who use mass media to ‘inform’ public debate – are the ones who count. They are the new elite, the new lords and masters of the brave new world, and it is this group that has been so thoroughly targeted and infiltrated by all and any group with a political or commercial axe to grind. It doesn’t matter what some obscure group of scientists believe, or what the mass of people believe, what matters is what this group do in terms of forming (rather than informing) public opinion.
    This group then are by and large the group that actually carries out political change. They are in charge of the fashionable bigotry that comprises what we have come to know and love as political correctness. That vast and loosely affiliated propaganda machine that tells us what to think about, and what to think about it.
    What we need to do if we are to introduce truth into this tissue of lies and deceit, is to make the case to the media/political luvvies that in fact their particular brand of bigotry is deeply dangerous to themselves as a class.
    In the case of AGW we have two main avenues through which this is happening.
    First of all the man in the street is getting fed up with falling standards of living, and his winters seeming just as cold wet and miserable as the summers are, despite claims it was the warmest year on record.
    Secondly the more astute members of the tellystocracy are becoming aware that infrastructure is for everyone, and that includes them. Victorian sewers were to protect the elite of the day from disease, by eliminating it from the great unwashed. This is a potent line of attack – Wind turbines and solar panels become not source of individual profit, but a disaster for all including those that profit from them.
    Ultimately the game is this: Science in its broadest terms is nothing more and nothing less than a means of predicting the future. Science says if we do this or that, the other will happen. The complex mathematical laws we deduce, infer or discover (according to your metaphysical picture of what Laws are) have no justification beyond the fact that they work, and what they say will come to pass, comes to pass, mostly.
    Science that fails to predict anything is untestable, and if it fails to produce the result that reality provides, it’s junk science or no science at all. You can summarise this by saying that in the long term reality trumps bullshit.
    Ultimately AGW either produces correct predictions or its junk, It’s looking to be junk. However that doesn’t stop people believing in it because it’s fashionable bigotry. But here we invoke Darwin. Societies that fail to realise what reality is, and cling to fashionable bigotry, will suffer accordingly. There are signs that the whole West will in fact ultimately collapse in an orgy of self destructive mutual deception and liberal angst. Or perhaps it will wake up and smell the coffee.
    And in the end, that is the conundrum. It is true to say that people are reasonably easily led, and that even those that lead them, are themselves subject to fashionable bigotry. That is a fact of life that we have to deal with. In the end we have only one yardstick that works to dispel the fog of Belief In Bullshit and that is Reality herself, and Reality is a hard mistress. If She needs to destroy entire societies that are so infected with irrational bullshit that they can no longer support themselves at all, She will.
    I don’t like to get political here, but this is to me the great argument for not having the sort of monolithic world government that the cultural Marxists of the UN and the ‘liberal and social’ democracies seem to espouse. that and we all go down together. Whereas having political islands of national ideologies at least allows for some diversity of political thought, and if the West becomes so decadent not because of Capitalism, but because of Marxism and its descendants itself, that it is in danger of falling to a stronger culture, maybe one of those political islands will have the tools and the strength to resist and prove to have the next line of fashionable bigotry to deal with the new reality.
    From my perspective there are two completely different dimensions in play here, and it helps not to confuse them.
    There is the technical and scientific reality of the data: that the world ain’t warming any more, never warmed very much, and windmills and solar panels are a complete waste of time and money, and destructive to boot, and if we want to stay alive in the absence of fossil fuel the logical alternative is nuclear power.
    That these things are provably and demonstrably true is, however, irrelevant to the second dimension, which is what people think.
    Or can be induced to believe. And here there is in fact a world war in progress, World War III. Its not being fought with weapons (much) that kill, directly, but with weapons that corrupt thinking. It is a war of propaganda and competing ideologies, none of which have a particularly strong basis in Reality, because Reality is pretty damned complicated, and its easier to get people to believe in simple stuff. ‘Four legs good – two legs bad’ sort of stuff.
    I have to say that I have more or less given up on the science: The jury is in for people to understand the maths and the physics and how real science works. AGW is a crock of shit, and that’s that.
    The real game is the war for hearts and minds. And that is a game of psychology, propaganda, money, power, politics, greed, fear, uncertainty and doubt. If we can’t win it, it will in the end destroy Western civilisation, and so it should. If we have no answer for lies, we don’t deserve to make it.
    Once we had a system that worked. The brightest and best, and a few of the rich, got excellent educations and were indoctrinated with a culture of care for those less fortunate, and a sense of duty towards the masses. They did what they considered to be right, after duly listening to the problems.
    Today that is destroyed by egalitarianism, which ensures that no one at all gets a good education that everyone cannot afford. Except for a very very few – too few – people who espouse state education but manage to avoid it in the case of their children. Worse, they dont educate them into the actualities of science and technology even then, they educate them into the practical techniques of propaganda. We have in short a generation of peole who are highly skilled in the manipulation of public opinion, but no idea how a smart phone works. People ideally placed to control and dominate a society, and take from it all its riches, but without actually having even the most basic understanding of how those riches are created.
    Such a situation is dynamically unstable. We, the technologists, are not screaming out for recognition ‘because its unfair’ or ‘because its morally indefensible’. No, we have a much quieter but devastatingly powerful message. “If you don’t take at least some notice of Reality, you will in fact die of ignorance, and likely take us with you”.
    *shrug* If they don’t listen, it’s Goodnight Vienna. We wont be the first culture to commit racial suicide in pursuit of idiotic beliefs.”
    —————————————-

    dbstealey February 23, 2015 at 2:56 am

    Leo Smith, You’re one in a million! Thanks for posting that, I’m in complete agreement. The problem isn’t science; that is 100% on the side of skeptics of MMGW. The problem is human nature. Some people/groups have that figured out, and that’s bad news for the rest of us.

    A.D. Everard February 23,2015 at 4:30 am

    Leo, your comment should be a post in itself. It should be widely read. This is so much what needs to be understood. Thank you.

    George Tetley February 23,2015 at 12:49 am

    WOW !!!
    Leo Smith February 23, 2015 at 1:59 am

    In one of Castenada’s novels there is a story about a young man who left his poor village in Mexico and went to the city to get an education.

    On his return to the village years later he found that the villagers were in thrall to a man who had a book, out of which he read long passages. This book it appeared contained all they needed to solve their problems. However the young man noticed that the man was holding the book upside down.

    “Your hero is a fraud: He cannot read” he declared “And I can prove it, he is holding the book upside down!”

    “What difference does it make, to a man who can read, which way up the book is? ” retorted the man, and the villagers cheered…

    The problem is Terry, that when people reject all of science already, a scientific refutation of global warming is (politically) meaningless.

    I too have been appalled by the standards of debate over this, and other, issues. I have come to a terrifying conclusion.

    Perhaps less than 10% of the population understands science at all, and of that 10% probably less than 10% actually understand the mathematical principles involved in the AGW proposition. And most of those are not in climate science.

    This is ultimately both something that has always been the case with science and indeed rational thought, and something that is deeply worrying right now, because we are in a deep crisis as a society and need better understanding than that.

    Humanity en masse proceeds along more or less bigoted lines according to the fashionable prejudices of the age. The AGW protagonists understand this: their business is to move the fashionable bigotry along to suit their agenda.

    If we step back a minute and regard the implications of what I propose to be the case, they are these: The vast majority of humanity is incapable for one reason or another of understanding the science and technology that forms the backdrop to their lives. And in a democracy that means they are more or less unfit to vote on matters that affect it.

    A small minority of ‘movers and shakers’ – and these days they are (to borrow Jilly Coopers terminology) the ‘Tellystocracy’ , the media luvvies and those who use mass media to ‘inform’ public debate – are the ones who count. They are the new elite, the new lords and masters of the brave new world, and it is this group that has been so thoroughly targeted and infiltrated by all and any group with a political or commercial axe to grind. It doesn’t matter what some obscure group of scientists believe, or what the mass of people believe, what matters is what this group do in terms of forming (rather than informing) public opinion.

    This group then are by and large the group that actually carries out political change. They are in charge of the fashionable bigotry that comprises what we have come to know and love as political correctness. That vast and loosely affiliated propaganda machine that tells us what to think about, and what to think about it.

    What we need to do if we are to introduce truth into this tissue of lies and deceit, is to make the case to the media/political luvvies that in fact their particular brand of bigotry is deeply dangerous to themselves as a class.

    In the case of AGW we have two main avenues through which this is happening.

    First of all the man in the street is getting fed up with falling standards of living, and his winters seeming just as cold wet and miserable as the summers are, despite claims it was the warmest year on record.

    Secondly the more astute members of the tellystocracy are becoming aware that infrastructure is for everyone, and that includes them. Victorian sewers were to protect the elite of the day from disease, by eliminating it from the great unwashed. This is a potent line of attack – Wind turbines and solar panels become not source of individual profit, but a disaster for all including those that profit from them.

    Ultimately the game is this: Science in its broadest terms is nothing more and nothing less than a means of predicting the future. Science says if we do this or that, the other will happen. The complex mathematical laws we deduce, infer or discover (according to your metaphysical picture of what Laws are) have no justification beyond the fact that they work, and what they say will come to pass, comes to pass, mostly.
    Science that fails to predict anything is untestable, and if it fails to produce the result that reality provides, it’s junk science or no science at all. You can summarise this by saying that in the long term reality trumps bullshit.

    Ultimately AGW either produces correct predictions or its junk, It’s looking to be junk. However that doesn’t stop people believing in it because it’s fashionable bigotry. But here we invoke Darwin. Societies that fail to realise what reality is, and cling to fashionable bigotry, will suffer accordingly. There are signs that the whole West will in fact ultimately collapse in an orgy of self destructive mutual deception and liberal angst. Or perhaps it will wake up and smell the coffee.

    And in the end, that is the conundrum. It is true to say that people are reasonably easily led, and that even those that lead them, are themselves subject to fashionable bigotry. That is a fact of life that we have to deal with. In the end we have only one yardstick that works to dispel the fog of Belief In Bullshit and that is Reality herself, and Reality is a hard mistress. If She needs to destroy entire societies that are so infected with irrational bullshit that they can no longer support themselves at all, She will.

    I don’t like to get political here, but this is to me the great argument for not having the sort of monolithic world government that the cultural Marxists of the UN and the ‘liberal and social’ democracies seem to espouse. that and we all go down together. Whereas having political islands of national ideologies at least allows for some diversity of political thought, and if the West becomes so decadent not because of Capitalism, but because of Marxism and its descendants itself, that it is in danger of falling to a stronger culture, maybe one of those political islands will have the tools and the strength to resist and prove to have the next line of fashionable bigotry to deal with the new reality

    From my perspective there are tow completely different dimensions in play here, and it helps not to confuse them.

    There is the technical and scientific reality of the data: that the world ain’t warming any more, never warmed very much, and windmills and solar panels are a complete waste of time and money, and destructive to boot, and if we want to stay alive in the absence of fossil fuel the logical alternative is nuclear power.

    That these things are provably and demonstrably true is, however, irrelevant to the second dimension, which is what people think.

    Or can be induced to believe. And here there is in fact a world war in progress, World War III. Its not being fought with weapons (much) that kill, directly, but with weapons that corrupt thinking. It is a war of propaganda and competing ideologies, none of which have a particularly strong basis in Reality, because Reality is pretty damned complicated, and its easier to get people to believe in simple stuff. ‘Four legs good – two legs bad’ sort of stuff.

    I have to say that I have more or less given up on the science: The jury is in for people to understand the maths and the physics and how real science works. AGW is a crock of shit, and that’s that.

    The real game is the war for hearts and minds. And that is a game of psychology, propaganda, money, power, politics, greed, fear, uncertainty and doubt. If we can’t win it, it will in the end destroy Western civilisation, and so it should. If we have no answer for lies, we don’t deserve to make it.

    Once we had a system that worked. The brightest and best, and a few of the rich, got excellent educations and were indoctrinated with a culture of care for those less fortunate, and a sense of duty towards the masses. They did what they considered to be right, after duly listening to the problems.

    Today that is destroyed by egalitarianism, which ensures that no one at all gets a good education that everyone cannot afford. Except for a very very few – too few – people who espouse state education but manage to avoid it in the case of their children. Worse, they dont educate them into the actualities of science and technology even then, they educate them into the practical techniques of propaganda. We have in short a generation of peole who are highly skilled in the manipulation of public opinion, but no idea how a smart phone works. People ideally placed to control and dominate a society, and take from it all its riches, but without actually having even the most basic understanding of how those riches are created.

    Such a situation is dynamically unstable. We, the technologists, are not screaming out for recognition ‘because its unfair’ or ‘because its morally indefensible’. No, we have a much quieter but devastatingly powerful message. “If you don’t take at least some notice of Reality, you will in fact die of ignorance, and likely take us with you”.

    *shrug* If they don’t listen, it’s Goodnight Vienna. We wont be the first culture to commit racial suicide in pursuit of idiotic beliefs.

    dbstealey February 23, 2015 at 2:56 am

    Leo Smith, You’re one in a million! Thanks for posting that, I’m in complete agreement. The problem isn’t science; that is 100% on the side of skeptics of MMGW. The problem is human nature. Some people/groups have that figured out, and that’s bad news for the rest of us.

    A.D. Everard February 23, 2015 at 4:30 am

    Leo, your comment should be a post in itself. It should be widely read. This is so much what needs to be understood. Thank you.

    George Tetley February 23, 2015 at 12:49 am

    WOW !!!
    __________________________

    I would like to add my own WOW! We have from now to December 2015 folks!

  8. Pointman says:

    Pachauri resigns from the IPCC.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-31601122

    The search for a replacement of suitable integrity begins. Bernie Madoff is the hot candidate.

    P

    • DD More says:

      Does his story of hacking have a tie in to Dr. Soon’s case? So Pachman gets nabbed and has to make up a story quick. Knowing that his allies have gotten Soon’s accounts, well this will clear him, see others have the same problem.

  9. Tobias Smit says:

    @ Leo Smith, Thanks what a great explanation of some, if not most of the cr.p that is happening, I just discovered Pointman’s site and it is educational, refreshing and to the point (no pun intended), @ Leo, ( are you my father talking to me from the grave? his name is Leonardus Smit and had the same wisdom as you, so thank you, it brings back some great conversations I had with him).

  10. Pointman says:

    It doesn’t appear to matter what crimes these green gurus get up to, they’re invulnerable. Pachauri promoted in TERI.

    http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/6JTSzHCxXWjJNsgRbcgQSJ/Lessons-from-TERI-and-the-Pachauri-case.html

    Pointman

Trackbacks
Check out what others are saying...
  1. […] Pointman’s analysis [link] […]



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: